img Nigerialog.com - Nigeria's Premier Online Forum - Why Obasanjo handed Bakassi over to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians — Adoke
Welcome, Guest.
Did you miss your activation email?

Date: October 14, 2019, 09:58:47 PM

Contact
imgimgimg

Why Obasanjo handed Bakassi over to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians — Adoke: Politics : Nigerialog.com - Nigeria's Premier Online Forum

90 views

Why Obasanjo handed Bakassi over to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians — Adoke

By: dayan (M) |Time : September 14, 2019, 10:00:33 PM
…says Senate’s frantic bid to spurn the UN’s Greentree belated

…How some Nigerians wanted to extort FG of $17 m for research on Bakassi history

..Why I disagreed with Gov Imoke and Senator Ndoma-Egba on review


By Soni Daniel, Northern Region Editor

Thirteen years after Nigeria handed over its oil-rich Bakassi Peninsular to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians, the main reason behind the presidential action has emerged.

Obasanjo-1.jpg
Obasanjo

The former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke, says there was nothing Obasanjo and his government could have done to stop the action, which had already received the blessing of the United Nations under the leadership    of Kofi Annan.

Adoke in his new book-”Burden of Service: Reminisces of Nigeria’s Former Attorney General’, pointed out that it was already too late in 2007 for the Nigerian government to reverse the October 10, 2002 ruling of the International Court of Justice, which had given Bakassi Peninsular to Cameroun.

The former minister also advanced reasons   he opposed the duo of the then Governor Lyel Imoke of Cross River State and Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, who tried desperately to get President Goodluck Jonathan to get agreement reviewed.

According to him, the belated attempt by the Nigerian Senate in 2007 to impugn the Greentree Agreement, six months after Obasanjo had left office was an exercise in futility, which he knew would not reverse the crucial decision of the ICJ and for which he was labeled a saboteur.

The former justice minister said in the book due for launch on Monday that since Obasanjo had already signed an agreement with Paul Biya of Cameoun with Kofi Annan as the mediator, there was nothing the country could have done again to stop the implementation of the pact.

Adoke said: “In 2012, with less than six months remaining to approach the ICJ for a possible review of the judgment, there was increased campaign for it. In September 2012, while the “Take Back Baakassi” campaign was raging, President Jonathan led the Nigerian delegation, of which I was a member, to the 67th  United Nations General Assembly.

“The clamour to rescind the agreement waxed stronger, unabated. In fact, it was reaching a crescendo. Senator Lyel Imoke, then Governor of Cross River State and Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, then Senate Leader, also from Cross River State, approached me with a request to appeal the ICJ judgment.

“I informed them that Article 60 of the ICJ Statute foreclosed any appeal. But application for a review of the judgment was possible under Article 61 where new facts have emerged that were not available at the time the case came before the ICJ.

“The materials they were presenting as new facts were already available and canvassed by the Nigerian legal team before the ICJ. It would, therefore, amount to a worthless exercise to reopen the matter which would only constitute an embarrassment to Nigeria.

adoke-CJN.jpg
Former attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke

“The President had already given an irrevocable assurance to the UN Secretary-General that we were not going back on the issue of Bakassi. I informed them that as a member of the UN, Nigeria was bound by Article 103 of the UN Charter to respect the judgment of the ICJ, which is an organ of the UN.

“I was later to discover a hidden political agenda to the clamour when I received a letter from some groups reiterating the possibility of applying for a review. All that was needed, they claimed, was for the federal government to pay them $17 million to conduct a research to unearth new and fresh facts that would form the basis of evidence to be presented for a review. It dawned on me at that point that the agitation was nothing but a grand scheme to make money!” Adoke said.

“When people talk about the ICJ judgment, not many talk about the enormous gains Nigeria derived from it. For instance, Nigerian gained a lot of landmass particularly on the northern boundary with Cameroun. This is in addition to the fact that a good number of oil wells ended up in the Nigerian territory.

“I was able to curtail the activities of civil servants who did not want the assignment to come to an end as it would dry up the financial benefit they drew from the estacode payments,” the former minister revealed.

Source

Re: Why Obasanjo handed Bakassi over to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians — Adoke

By: dayan (M) |Time : September 14, 2019, 10:24:31 PM
Perhaps Bakassi case is unique in the sense that I cannot recall any other instance whereby a country unilaterally ceded its land and people to the sovereignty of another country.

What normally happens is that referendum is conducted so that the people themselves decide their own fate, afterall they are human beings and not just property. When Nigeria and Cameroun exchanged lands in the North (Adamawa) and South (English Cameroon), there was a referendum conducted. In Bakassi case, it was simply handed over.

I remember vividly that Gen Sani Abacha simply refused to hand the land over, and actually sent in thousands (some say 10,000) of Nigerian troops to keep the place in Nigeria.

Obasanjo ceded it, perhaps, as part of his personal effort to do opposite of everything Abacha did.


Re: Why Obasanjo handed Bakassi over to Cameroun despite protests by Nigerians — Adoke

By: alagbe003 (M) |Time : September 16, 2019, 06:11:53 PM
Perhaps Bakassi case is unique in the sense that I cannot recall any other instance whereby a country unilaterally ceded its land and people to the sovereignty of another country.

What normally happens is that referendum is conducted so that the people themselves decide their own fate, afterall they are human beings and not just property. When Nigeria and Cameroun exchanged lands in the North (Adamawa) and South (English Cameroon), there was a referendum conducted. In Bakassi case, it was simply handed over.

I remember vividly that Gen Sani Abacha simply refused to hand the land over, and actually sent in thousands (some say 10,000) of Nigerian troops to keep the place in Nigeria.

Obasanjo ceded it, perhaps, as part of his personal effort to do opposite of everything Abacha did.
I agree with your points bro, their is a selfish interest associated with the handing over of Bakassi when those people could have decided their fate through referendum.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Reply

web site traffic statistics